HOME
FERN FORUM
ANZC FORM GUIDE
ANZC POINTS TABLE
ALL BLACKS
2008 AB PLAYER STATS
2008 ALL BLACK FIXTURES
FORUM MEMBER SPOTLIGHT
BUY A FERN TEE SHIRT
FERN NEWS
SUPER 14
2008 SUPER 14 DRAW
2008 SUPER 14 LOG
2008 SUPER 14 TEAMS
2008 BLUES
2008 CHIEFS
2008 HURRICANES
2008 CRUSADERS
2008 HIGHLANDERS
2008 TRI SERIES
FERN FEATURES
FERN ARCHIVES
SEARCH THE FERN
GREEN AND GOLD RUGBY
RUGBY LINKS
ABOUT THE FERN
KIWI WEATHER
NPC RESULTS 76-08
NICK NAMES
TSF DICTIONARY
BACK DOOR
Buy Super 14 Kit
Buy All Black Kit
Buy NPC Kit
Just Google it!
Syndicate the Fern
Become an inmate





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Inmates
We have 7 inmates online
SUPPORT THE FERN
Wicked Weasel's Sammy

healthanbody

significantmoments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
ELVs - time for the IRB to grow some balls? Print E-mail
Written by Crucial   
Sunday, 14 September 2008
We all know that the IRB has made a huge hash of trialling these variations with different sets being played around the world and bizarre situations like the Wallabies and ABs not even knowing what variations they will be playing in Hong Kong before playing to another set in the NH!

What has happened though is that we now have had many of the worlds best players and coaches (and Puppets) working the variations to their advantage in a highly competitive competition between the top 3 sides in the world. Add this to the experience from the Super14 and I think that we can see the effect that they have had quite clearly.

There have been many of us willing to give the changes a chance to see what happens and others who dismissed them from the start, but surely enough is now enough and the effects are plain to see? They are certainly not the effects that either the optimists or doomsayers expected but have come though the trials so far as an obvious pointer to how the way the game is played will be under these changes.

Games have deteriorated into large periods of force back. The unfortunate result of the rule (pass back into 22) that was designed to increase the ball in play time has just created endless and tedious high kicks in the midfield. The game has lost a lot of shape as players stand around waiting for the next piece of traditional play where they can do their own jobs.

The free kick ELV that had possibilities of stopping offending by giving the refs the option to blow quickly and get play moving again had resulted in more offending. Not necessarily because of the decreased punishment, but because it has created a lottery in which each free kick has often resulted in a change of possession. Players are simply wanting to create the situation where the lottery kicks in and they have a chance of getting the ball from the ref rather than from contesting it.

There is an indication recently that in some NH comps the refs are strictly enforcing the players at the breakdown to stay on their feet. This was, as extolled by many pundits for years, the solution that didn't require changes. There wasn't anything wrong with the Laws, just the way they were being applied.

The only ELVs that have come up smelling roses are the quick throw in one and the 5 metre offside line at the scrum.

I was an advocate for giving the ELVs a shot but I've seen enough. The cynical nature of professional rugby has swiftly negated most of the benefits that they were designed to produce. Perhaps it's time for the IRB to grow some balls and call an end to experimentation. Make a few minor changes and direct the refs to enforce strongly the Laws as they were written.

 
 
Latest from the Fern
Most read articles