|
While there is plenty to admire about the pluck
and grit shown by the minnows in this years ANZ Cup, the little fish will never
be able to foot it with the big boys so long as the NZRU allow unions like
Canterbury and Auckland to double dip. The current transfer regulations are
nothing short of a farce, with unions able to lend players out to their rivals
(who also pay a good portion of their wages) only to demand their return
whenever they deem necessary. It would appear this is yet another example of the
big boys finding a loophole, not only to beat the salary cap, but also
ultimately to disadvantage their opponents.
Already this season two ANZ Cup players, Tom
McCartney and Ben Franks have managed to represent four provinces between them.
This isn't a new phenomenon of course with players such as James Arlidge and
Miah Nikora having been shuffled around mid season by the likes of Auckland and
Wellington respectively in the past.
Take the case of Ben Franks, the tighthead
prop, who was loaned by Canterbury to Tasman this season. Franks and another
promising Crusaders prop Ben May had established themselves as the cornerstone
of this seasons Mako's forward pack. Unfortunately for Tasman, Canterbury found
themselves next in line for a Ranfurly Shield challenge against Waikato.
Suddenly Franks was released from the Tasman squad and returned to the Red and
Blacks, so he could take his place on the bench for Canterbury in Hamilton. As
the situation stands now, Franks is not going to get the 80 minutes of game time
every week that he desperately needs to pick up a Super 14 contract. From a
Crusaders perspective, it would have much made more sense to leave him at Tasman
where he clock up valuable experience in the number three jersey.
To add insult to Tasman's injury, Franks was
nowhere to be seen in the shield defence against Hawke's Bay, just six days
later. There were no press releases I could find listing any injury to Franks,
so it would appear that Canterbury were happy to disrupt the rest of Tasman's
season so they could have more firepower on the bench for one game. I'm sure
Franks will be seen again on the bench later in the season for the Auckland
match, which hardly makes his acquisition anymore worthwhile in my book.
Of course technically Canterbury haven't done
anything wrong and Tasman have benefited from having Franks service for a minute
portion of the season. I'm sure the Mako's would have been only too well aware
of the conditions of Franks services as laid down by their big bro Canterbury.
However Tasman don't want to bite the hand that feeds them so realistically they
aren't in a position of strength to complain publicly about the matter. The loss
of such a valuable player in a pivotal position will effectively derail any slim
chance Tasman may have of making the semi finals. Lets also cast our minds back
to Rico Gear and the disruptions he has caused to Tasman's preparations, both
this year and last. Now Ali Williams has signed with Tasman, with the obvious
intention of lure of a Crusaders berth. I'm certainly not going to hold my
breath at the prospect of Ali managing to play the amount of games required to
receive his blazer for Tasman.
What sort of a competition exactly is the ANZ
Cup when players can turn out for two provinces in the same season? There is
also the possibility that a player could end up playing against a union they
have already represented only weeks earlier. Confidential information concerning
tactics and strategies would of course be passed onto new team mates and
undermine everything that smaller union was trying to achieve. For teams to
succeed their personal need continuity of selection. The sudden withdrawal of
key players effectively destroys the valuable momentum that winning teams thrive
on and feed off.
Its high time the NZRU forced the hand of the
heavyweights by abolishing the transfer system, which would in turn see more
players move unions to get exposure and regular top level rugby. Provincial
unions can afford to bankroll a finite number of players. The likes of Ben
Franks would either find themselves selected in the Canterbury ANZ Cup squad or
would move to a union like Tasman on a full time basis. Unions like Bay of Plenty
continually find themselves stuck in a rebuilding mode year after year as their
better talent is continually snapped up by bigger provinces or offers from
abroad. The five Super 14 franchise host unions have been given enough
advantages by the NZRU over the last ten years, without continuously benefiting
from the flawed transfer system. The likes of Canterbury, Auckland, Wellington,
Waikato and Otago have been able to lure new players to their provinces with the
added carrot of a Super 14 contract dangled tantalisingly nearby. Waikato and
the Chiefs have made the first worthy step into dissolving this partnership by
appointing individual CEOs to run their two organisations as separate entities.
Whether this split dissolves the link between host union and host franchise
remains to be seen, as does the likelihood of the four main unions following
their lead. For the ANZ Cup to become a truly dynamic and inspiring, we
need new winners names engraved on the trophy.
Since the inception of the NPC playoffs system
in 1992 only the five Super 14 base unions have managed to win this competition
which has been dominated by Canterbury and Auckland. Will the likes of Manawatu
or Counties one day become legitimate title contenders or should their
supporters accept they are only there to make up the numbers? Unless the NZRU
take a stand, our provincial rugby will continue to be predictable and anything
but competitive at the business end of the season.
About Red Beard: Found as a babe in a
Kumara pit by a savage pack of wild boar who raised him until the age of 13. Nowadays a respected rugby journo and part time public bar warrior.
Read more from Red Beard:
http://redbeardrugby.blogspot.com/
|