HOME
FERN FORUM
ANZC FORM GUIDE
ANZC POINTS TABLE
ALL BLACKS
2008 AB PLAYER STATS
2008 ALL BLACK FIXTURES
FORUM MEMBER SPOTLIGHT
BUY A FERN TEE SHIRT
FERN NEWS
SUPER 14
2008 SUPER 14 DRAW
2008 SUPER 14 LOG
2008 SUPER 14 TEAMS
2008 BLUES
2008 CHIEFS
2008 HURRICANES
2008 CRUSADERS
2008 HIGHLANDERS
2008 TRI SERIES
FERN FEATURES
FERN ARCHIVES
SEARCH THE FERN
RUGBY LINKS
ABOUT THE FERN
KIWI WEATHER
BACK DOOR
Buy Super 14 Kit
Buy All Black Kit
Buy NPC Kit
Just Google it!
Syndicate the Fern
Become an inmate





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Inmates
We have 2 inmates online
SUPPORT THE FERN
Wicked Weasel's Sammy

healthanbody

significantmoments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
The ELVs: Expectations vs Reality Print E-mail
Written by Knock on Wood   
Tuesday, 20 May 2008
Much as the forces of darkness would like to pretend the ELVs debate is all black and white, a few astute posters on the Fern have been upfront about what they feel works and what they feel doesn't.

Knock on Wood is among the more thoughtful of these posters, comparing in this piece his own expectations against reality and demonstrating that we really need to give the experimental rules a decent crack before rushing to judgement.

Stuff that sucks about the new laws in the Super 14 (in my opinion):

•  they make the game more complex
•  they increase referee discretion over what level of penalty (long arm or short arm) to apply to offences
•  there appears to be more infringing around the ruck due to the penalty downgrade
•  the touch judges have been needlessly renamed (change for change sake)
•  when a player hits the corner flag the ref has to go upstairs because the flag is no longer an indicator that you're in touch (why change the flag law?)
•  scoring off 5m scrums just seems to be a lot lot easier (too easy?)
•  the ref has to yell free kick, scrum or penalty advantage so viewers and players know what type of advantage is being played
•  the offside at tackle law causes scrambling defence to have to play against all natural instinct and not tackle a player from behind until that player crosses the line of the last tackle
•  they don't fix the mess at the breakdown
•  it's still up to the ref's judgement whether a player won the ball fairly before the ruck formed or had his hands in the ruck and should be penalised.

Stuff that is great about the ELVs in the Super 14 (in my opinion):

•  we don't have endless kicks to touch from the 22
•  they allow for referee discretion so clearly cheating sides get full arm penalties for repeatedly cheating but when its a grey area "both teams infringing situation" the penalty is only a freekick
•  fullbacks and scrambling defence have to think very fast on their feet and take options more cleverly and skilfully... there is actual encouragement for counter attack
•  scrums are finally an attacking weapon again
•  technicalities and different interpretations don't result in an age waiting for one player to line up a kick and slot 3 undeserved points
•  the game is faster
•  the ball is in play longer
•  fitness counts for more, set play counts for less (levels the playing field slightly and gives hope to scratch teams like the Lions and Island teams once again)
•  they really encourage offloading and attacking play and swing the pendulum in favour of attack instead of defence

Things I thought would suck but don't in reality:

•  I thought that scrummaging would become uncontested and that it would encourage teams to field a front row of loose forwards. That has proven bloody unlikely to be a good strategy with so many more scrums occurring.
•  I thought fewer lineouts would suck, but they are still a critical element of the sport and I don't miss watching teams trudging back into position for another midfield lineout.
•  I thought the offside tackle line would allow way too many breakaway tries, but I think it encourages and rewards offloading and attack, reduces incidents of "lazy runners", makes the game less dominated by defence and forces teams to rethink their defensive patterns.
•  I thought the no kick outs on the full from the 22  would result in aimless kicking, but instead it results in a whole new type of set play•  the kicking duel! It encourages teams to play the game and try different options, really adding interest for me.

New laws I'd personally like to see trialled:

•  Drop goal attempts that go dead result in the scrum• back option like any other kick (this simplifies the rules, makes them more consistent and discourages drop goals•  win win win!)
•  Allow the TMO to judge on any incident between the last breakdown and a possible try rather than just incidents in goal (removes the forward pass wins a world cup quarter final bullpuckey)
•  Allowing hands in the ruck for players on their feet, or instead, making it that the Ref has to yell hands off as soon as he judges a ruck is formed. Until he does so, any player can use hands in any ruck, but as soon as he yells hands off, everyone must keep hands off until ref says "ball is out" or be penalised (removes those "he was hard done by" ruck events).

** note that some of the things I think suck are directly entwined with things I think are good! Ref discretion CAN  be a good thing, but it can be a terrible thing... all depending on the individual situation: no two rucks are the same!

 
< Prev   Next >
 
Latest from the Fern
Most read articles