Much as the forces of darkness would like to pretend the ELVs debate
is all black and white, a few astute posters on the Fern have been
upfront about what they feel works and what they feel doesn't.
Knock
on Wood is among the more thoughtful of these posters, comparing in
this piece his own expectations against reality and demonstrating that
we really need to give the experimental rules a decent crack before
rushing to judgement.
Stuff that sucks about the new laws in the
Super 14 (in my opinion):
• they make the game more complex
• they increase referee discretion over what level of penalty (long arm or
short arm) to apply to offences
• there appears to be more infringing around the ruck due to the penalty
downgrade
• the touch judges have been needlessly renamed (change for change sake)
• when a player hits the corner flag the ref has to go upstairs because
the flag is no longer an indicator that you're in touch (why change the flag
law?)
• scoring off 5m scrums just seems to be a lot lot easier (too easy?)
• the ref has to yell free kick, scrum or penalty advantage so viewers and
players know what type of advantage is being played
• the offside at tackle law causes scrambling defence to have to play
against all natural instinct and not tackle a player from behind until that
player crosses the line of the last tackle
• they don't fix the mess at the breakdown
• it's still up to the ref's judgement whether a player won the ball
fairly before the ruck formed or had his hands in the ruck and should be
penalised.
Stuff that is great about the ELVs in the
Super 14 (in my opinion):
• we don't have endless kicks to touch
from the 22
• they allow for referee discretion so clearly cheating sides get full arm
penalties for repeatedly cheating but when its a grey area "both teams
infringing situation" the penalty is only a freekick
• fullbacks and scrambling defence have to think very fast on their feet
and take options more cleverly and skilfully... there is actual encouragement
for counter attack
• scrums are finally an attacking weapon again
• technicalities and different interpretations don't result in an age
waiting for one player to line up a kick and slot 3 undeserved points
• the game is faster
• the ball is in play longer
• fitness counts for more, set play counts for less (levels the playing
field slightly and gives hope to scratch teams like the Lions and Island teams
once again)
• they really encourage offloading and attacking play and swing the
pendulum in favour of attack instead of defence
Things I thought would suck but don't in
reality:
• I thought that scrummaging would become
uncontested and that it would encourage teams to field a front row of loose
forwards. That has proven bloody unlikely to be a good strategy with so many
more scrums occurring.
• I thought fewer lineouts would suck, but they are still a critical
element of the sport and I don't miss watching teams trudging back into position
for another midfield lineout.
• I thought the offside tackle line would allow way too many breakaway
tries, but I think it encourages and rewards offloading and attack, reduces
incidents of "lazy runners", makes the game less dominated by defence and forces
teams to rethink their defensive patterns.
• I thought the no kick outs on the full from the 22 would result in
aimless kicking, but instead it results in a whole new type of set play•
the kicking duel! It encourages teams to play the game and try different
options, really adding interest for me.
New laws I'd personally like to see trialled:
• Drop goal attempts that go dead result
in the scrum• back option like any other kick (this simplifies the rules, makes
them more consistent and discourages drop goals• win win win!)
• Allow the TMO to judge on any incident between the last breakdown and a
possible try rather than just incidents in goal (removes the forward pass wins a
world cup quarter final bullpuckey)
• Allowing hands in the ruck for players on their feet, or instead, making
it that the Ref has to yell hands off as soon as he judges a ruck is formed.
Until he does so, any player can use hands in any ruck, but as soon as he yells
hands off, everyone must keep hands off until ref says "ball is out" or be
penalised (removes those "he was hard done by" ruck events).
** note that some of the things I think suck
are directly entwined with things I think are good! Ref discretion CAN be a
good thing, but it can be a terrible thing... all depending on the individual
situation: no two rucks are the same!
|