Stats - Some Problems for the ABs?

MOTM voting was tricky - I went for Savea and Mo'unga, and I was tempted to give Read a vote, but he accounted for about half (4) of our penalties (9), so he droped out. Finding a third vote was hard.

EPSN Stats
TSF Man of the Match voting

From looking at the stats of the game (see link above), here is the crucial stat for me - according to ESPN, we had one offload. All game. We just never got going. Before this test, what money would you get if you bet that Etzebeth (1) would have the same number of offloads as the entire AB team?

So, what can we learn from the stats?

We played with the ball for 40% of the test (apparently) but kicked it 21 times in comparison to their 20. Beauden Barrett probably had his worst game in black: Five runs for 11 metres, although he beat three defenders. He made slightly more tackles (4) than he missed (3), but conceded three turnovers. It's worth noting that a lot of those metres and (at least) two of those defenders beaten happened after he went to FB.

Btw, in thirty minutes, Mo'unga ran twice for 10 metres, and beat two defenders, making one tackle and missing none. Where is the front foot ball?

Only two forwards ran for more than 10 metres (Whitelock, 12; Taylor, 23 - 15 of them from one break), and there were a few missed tackles with Whitelock missing two and making 10, and Franks missing two and making nine. Taylor also missed one and made nine, but also conceded one turnover, and under threw at least one line out, being outplayed by Marx.

If you take out the hookers (where Marx ran for one more metre than Taylor), their locks ran for about the some amount of metres (26) as the rest of our starting forward pack (31).

Our loosies ran for a total (including Savea) of 10 metres. In comparison, SA got 100 from theirs, with Du Toit getting 44 of them. That's telling, as he beat a number of defenders, including making SBW (amongst others) look a bit silly. Frizell made 12 tackles, missing none (leading the forwards) but ran once for two metres. That's it. I don't think he got many chances of course, thanks to the fucking stupid kicks and dropped balls, but nevertheless, we got no real go forward from any of our supposedly 'power' runners (except one Taylor break that led to a try). SA defended well, but also I don't think we ever really tried to use him or Read or Savea (Cane has zero running metres btw) anywhere except for tackling. We miss Moody, BBBR and even Squire there. Is it time for the midfield to be re-assessed?

While the individual missed tackles are a killer, a lot of them happened through 10-14. A total of 24 tackles were missed according to ESPN, with B Barrett (3), SBW (3, I think one leading to a try), Crotty (2, including one misalignment leading to a try), Ioane (2), and Naholo (1) all missing tackles.

Looking at SBW, it's hard not to wonder whether he should be first choice. He has had one good game this year (versus the French), but been poor in the last two. In this game, he made two passes, two runs, and gained as many metres (3) as he missed tackles (3), while also giving up a penalty.

Crotty led all tacklers (14) with two misses and one turnover, and managed 39 metres on eight runs - but looked out of place on defence at times - quite simply, he is just better at 12. It seems past time for ALB to be given a shot - contributing 16 metres off three runs, while also making three tackles with no misses. Goodhue's sickness is a shame, but his the future.

So, lots to work on - not just tackling and kicking. Reading those stats, I can't see how we won - which just shows their limitations - because they don't show the quality of decisions in the last 10 minutes when we got ball, straightened things up, got some metres from the subs (RM with 10, ALB with 16), kicked better, and used the forwards (both as a group and individually - Pat T with 2 runs for 6 metres helps here), and managed to get over the line.

Duluth
Duluth
October 8, 4:02am

https://www.thesilverfern.com/2018/10/08/stats-point-to-some-ab-problems

This was written by @gt12

I thought it deserves a thread of its own. It'll get lost in the main one

No Quarter
No Quarter
October 7, 11:53pm

@gt12 thanks for the summary, interesting reading.

gt12
gt12
October 7, 11:57pm

@no-quarter

Yeah, they don't tell the full story - of course - but it's not good reading.

Just for fun, before the test, what money would you get if you bet that Etzebeth (1) would have the same number of offloads as the entire AB team?

Bovidae
Bovidae
October 8, 12:00am

@gt12 Not too surprising about the lack of run metres in the starting forwards. Moody is the best of the props, BBBR much better than Whitelock and Squire the most effective amongst the loose forwards. None of those 3 were playing. If the forwards aren't making ground up the middle it's hard for the backs to play off.

We saw none of the short passes to Frizell that were so effective in Nelson, but we didn't in Arg either. It has to be tactics.

Bones
Bones
October 8, 12:00am

@gt12 sheesh, when you think Taylor probably did almost all of those metres in one run too....

gt12
gt12
October 8, 12:02am

@bones

I was just checking the game to see that!

Bones
Bones
October 8, 12:03am

@gt12 keen to know!

gt12
gt12
October 8, 12:03am

@bovidae

My guess is that they found some things that worked and put them away, or that they never had the ball for long enough to get going.

mariner4life
mariner4life
October 8, 12:05am

@bovidae said in MOTM All Blacks v Springbokke II:

@gt12 Not too surprising about the lack of run metres in the starting forwards. Moody is the best of the props, BBBR much better than Whitelock and Squire the most effective amongst the loose forwards. None of those 3 were playing. If the forwards aren't making ground up the middle it's hard for the backs to play off.

We saw none of the short passes to Frizell that were so effective in Nelson, but we didn't in Arg either. It has to be tactics.

we didn't win any of the collisions for a long time in that game, which is sort of backed up by those run metre figures. The Boks were stopping our ball runners dead, and that contributed to our appalling ruck ball. They on the other hand got behind us, allowing them to generate really quick ball, which they used really well. We really should have been a lot further behind.

gt12
gt12
October 8, 12:09am

@bones said in MOTM All Blacks v Springbokke II:

@gt12 keen to know!

Looks like about 15 of them!

Plus, it's worth noting that we didn't score a try until Mo'unga was on - Barrett received the kick at FB and beat two men on the return, setting up the ruck for Taylor's break.

nzzp
nzzp
October 8, 3:41am

@mariner4life said in MOTM All Blacks v Springbokke II:

The Boks were stopping our ball runners dead, and that contributed to our appalling ruck ball. They on the other hand got behind us, allowing them to generate really quick ball, which they used really well. We really should have been a lot further behind.

This! Same as Wellington (and other games against the Bokke) - when they are interested defensively, i fyou don't have something special, they just form walls to run into. IT's awesome, btu hard to break down.

The LIons and the Boks show that if you have a team of big, committed physical players it is hard to break them down. You need something special. Good to have the boys remidned of this now, and not next year ?

sparky
sparky
October 8, 3:56am

@gt12 Excellent post. Very little go forward ball from the fatties, even less from the midfield meant BB had a tough game and the quick men out wide were living off scraps.

The return of Moody, BBBR and Squire will help. That said, I'd like to see Akira Ioane in the All Blacks set up. He is a very powerful ball-carrier who can break tackles and offload.

I know neither were available at Loftus but for me Laumape and Goodhue is the first-choice AB midfield.

Nepia
Nepia
October 8, 3:59am

Adjacent to the lack of go forward from the AB fatties, I noticed that the Boks have now employed our forwards passing close tactic and it worked quite effectively (I'm sure it took us at least a year to be competent at it - they seemed to have picked it up quick).

It's funny reading about this great comeback in a bunch of articles, but, I personally I didn't get any of the elation you normally have from these comeback wins, and I haven't warmed to it even more on the partial re-watch. It's a strange feeling - I wish I was over the moon about it. We still won a test with the Boks.

@sparky There's no way Laumape is part of the first choice midfield, he must be the last pick out of the current 5 if we're being honest.

Duluth
Duluth
October 8, 4:07am

Also, note that the article is longer than the original post. There's some more thoughts about the midfield etc

9

98blueandgold
October 8, 4:33am

I said this in other post. Taylor and Whitelock look like they need a rest. With BBBR and Squire, Moody and maybe Coles that solves issues...but injuries. Game plan with BBBR looks sooo different than without, takes pressure off 9/10
Best ball running forwards outside squad for NH tour that are available

Romano, Akira, Evans, papalii, Aumua.....
Others?

Give Taylor rest bring in Squire, Moody, BBBR should be resolved.

MN5
MN5
October 8, 5:57am

@gt12 said in Stats Indicate Some AB Problems:

@no-quarter

Yeah, they don't tell the full story - of course - but it's not good reading.

Just for fun, before the test, what money would you get if you bet that Etzebeth (1) would have the same number of offloads as the entire AB team?

Pretty even. The big fella has a set of massive cannons that he loves to free up when he's not busy doing Bruno impressions.